fig3

Decoding donor/acceptor hierarchy in DAD triads via fragment-centric machine learning

Figure 3. ML performance using FODs for predicting target attributes ΔETT and ΔEST. (A and B) Performance metrics (R2 in orange, RMSE in blue) across eight ML algorithms; (C-F) Predicted vs. actual values for RF and XGBoost models on both training and testing samples, demonstrating the prediction accuracy for attributes ΔETT (C and D) and ΔEST (E and F). The diagonal dashed lines represent ideal 1:1 correspondence. ML: Machine learning; FODs: fragment orbital descriptors; R2: the coefficient of determination; RMSE: root mean square error; RF: random forest; XGBoost: eXtreme gradient boosting; LR: linear regression; KNN: K-nearest neighbors; DT: decision tree; SVR: support vector regression; MLP: multilayer perceptron.

Journal of Materials Informatics
ISSN 2770-372X (Online)
Follow Us

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/

Portico

All published articles are preserved here permanently:

https://www.portico.org/publishers/oae/