Ice-activated hydrogel suction cups enabling unprecedented adhesion

Materials

All chemical reagents were used directly as received without additional purification. Acrylamide (AAm, 98%) was purchased from Kermel (Tianjin, China). Acryloyl chloride (98%), semicarbazide hydrochloride (98%), lithium phenyl-2,4,6-trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (LAP, 95%), anhydrous potassium carbonate (K₂CO₃, 99%), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, 98%) were obtained from Energy Chemical (Shanghai, China). Diethyl ether (99.5%) was supplied by Rianlon Bohua (Tianjin, China), and tartrazine (95%) was purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Deionized (DI) water was produced in-house.

Synthesis of N-acryloylsemicarbazide

N-acryloylsemicarbazide (NASC) was synthesized through an acylation reaction between semicarbazide hydrochloride and acryloyl chloride. Briefly, semicarbazide hydrochloride (31.75 g) was dispersed in DI water (30 mL), followed by the addition of chilled K₂CO₃ solution (168 mL, 2 M) and cold diethyl ether (90 mL) in a 500 mL flask. Acryloyl chloride (28.50 g) dissolved in diethyl ether (120 mL) was slowly introduced into the reaction system while maintaining the temperature at 0 °C. The mixture was continuously stirred at 800 rpm for 4 h. After completion of the reaction, the formed white solid was isolated by filtration and rinsed with cold DI water. The crude product was subsequently purified by dissolution in DI water followed by heating at 95 °C for 1 h. Insoluble residues were removed by centrifugation, and the purified NASC monomer was obtained after freeze-drying the collected supernatant.

Preparation of hydrogel

The NASC/AAm hydrogel precursor was prepared through photopolymerization. NASC (8.93 g) and AAm (3.57 g) were dissolved in a DMSO/water mixed solvent containing DMSO (26.25 g) and DI water (11.25 g). LAP (0.5 wt% relative to total monomers) and tartrazine (0.3 g·L^-1) were incorporated as the photoinitiator and light absorber, respectively. The precursor solution was homogenized by magnetic stirring at 70 °C for 60 min (400 rpm) and subsequently transferred into an acrylic mold (10 × 10 × 1 cm³). Polymerization was initiated using 405 nm irradiation at room temperature. The obtained organohydrogels were immersed in DI water for 5 days, with water replacement every 12 h, to eliminate residual DMSO and induce network reconstruction.

3D printing the hydrogel suction cups

The hydrogel ink was loaded into the resin vat of a commercial stereolithography 3D printer (SLASH, UNIZ, China) equipped with a 405 nm light source. Three-dimensional suction-cup geometries were designed as stereolithography (STL) files, imported into the printer software, and sliced along the Z direction prior to printing. Unless otherwise specified, all constructs were printed at room temperature using a layer thickness of 100 μm and an exposure time of 15-25 s per layer. After printing, the as-fabricated structures were immersed in DI water for 5 days to obtain hydrogel suction cups with enhanced mechanical performance.

Mechanical properties testing

Mechanical measurements were carried out using a universal testing machine (EZ-Test, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with a 500 N load cell. For tensile testing, rectangular specimens with dimensions of 1.0-1.3 mm in thickness and width were fixed between clamps with an initial gauge length of 25 mm. A stretching rate of 100 mm·min^-1 was applied until sample failure. Fracture stress and strain were obtained from the failure point of the stress–strain curves. Young’s modulus was calculated from the linear region between 5% and 15% strain. The work of fracture, or toughness, W (MJ·m^-3), was defined as the area under the stress-strain curve, as follows:

where σ_b and ε_b are the fracture stress and fracture strain, respectively^[44]. The compressive properties of the hydrogel under freezing conditions were evaluated using a customized temperature-controlled freezing platform. The platform temperature was independently regulated to achieve the desired testing temperatures (-25, -2, -5, -10, -15, and -20 °C). Before compression measurements, the hydrogel samples were placed on the cooling platform and maintained at the target temperature for sufficient time to establish a stable thermal condition. Compression tests were then performed while the sample temperature was maintained by the freezing platform. This setup enables a more realistic simulation of the practical operating conditions of the ice-activated hydrogel suction cup. The compression tests were conducted at a constant crosshead speed of 3 mm·min^-1. Cylindrical hydrogel specimens with a height of 4 mm and a diameter of 8 mm were used for the measurements. The compressive stress was calculated as F/A₀, where F is the applied force, and A₀ is the initial contact area of the specimen. The compressive strain was calculated as h₀-h/h₀, where h and h₀ denote the deformed and initial heights of the specimen, respectively. The compressive modulus (E, MPa) was determined from the slope of the stress–strain curve within the strain range of 5%-10%. For each sample, at least three independent measurements were performed. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, with the standard deviation shown as error bars.

Rheology behavior

Rheological characterization was performed using a HAAKE RS6000 rheometer equipped with a 35 mm parallel plate geometry. The thixotropic response was evaluated by alternating low and high shear stresses (1 and 2,000 Pa). Temperature-dependent measurements were conducted at 1 Hz frequency and 2,000 Pa stress amplitude while cooling from 25 to -10 °C.

Adhesion characterization of hydrogel suction cups

The adhesion strength of the hydrogel suction cups was measured using a universal testing machine (EZ-Test, Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with a 500 N load cell. All measurements were performed with custom-designed fixtures, which were externally coupled to thermal conduction and refrigeration modules to enable temperature-controlled testing. Force-displacement curves were recorded in compression mode at a crosshead speed of 10, 20, 50, and 100 mm·min^-1. To evaluate the effect of freezing time on the nonspecific adhesion performance of the suction cups, a preload of 1 N was applied, and the contact time was varied from 1 to 30 min (1, 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, and 30 min). To assess nonspecific adhesion across different interfacial conditions, adhesion tests were further conducted on substrates with varying attributes and surface roughness. Unless otherwise stated, the applied preload was fixed at 1 N, the crosshead speed was 10 mm·min^-1, and the contact time between the suction cup and substrate was maintained at 10 min (-20 °C).

Design strategy and fabrication of ice-activated hydrogel suction cups

A well-known phenomenon can be observed in everyday life: when a warm, soft, and water-rich tongue contacts a low-temperature surface such as ice, it gradually adheres strongly to the surface and becomes difficult to detach [Figure 1A]. The detailed mechanism is illustrated in Figure 1B. When the moist tongue contacts the cold ice surface, heat is rapidly transferred away from the tongue, leading to the freezing of free water and the boundary water film at the interface. Consequently, an initial ice layer is formed between the oral mucosa and the ice surface. With prolonged contact time, ice crystals continue to nucleate and grow within the microscopic gaps, surface depressions, and interface irregularities. These crystals bridge the two surfaces, forming a mechanically interlocked structure that enhances resistance to interfacial separation. Thus, the combined effects of interfacial freezing, ice-bridge formation, and ice-crystal-mediated mechanical interlocking result in strong adhesion, making detachment challenging. Inspired by this phenomenon, we developed hydrogel suction cups via vat photopolymerization 3D printing [Figure 1C]. To formulate a proof-of-concept supramolecular photocurable hydrogel ink, NASC and AAm were used as monomers, together with the water-soluble photoinitiator LAP and tartrazine as a photoabsorber, all dissolved in a mixed solvent of DMSO and DI water. To provide a more rigorous characterization of NASC, we have added both FTIR and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analyses to confirm its chemical structure and purity in Supplementary Figures 1-3. Following UV curing, the printed organohydrogels were immersed in DI water to facilitate microphase separation and hydrogen-bond reconstruction, yielding supramolecular hydrogels exhibiting excellent mechanical properties^[30,45-48]. Notably, vat photopolymerization enables the facile fabrication of hydrogel suction cups with tunable structures, sizes, and geometries. Subsequently, the printed hydrogel suction cups were assembled with a thermally conductive copper tube mold, a semiconductor cooling platform, and a polyimide film heater to construct an adhesion device [Figure 1D]. As shown in Figure 1E, at room temperature, the soft hydrogel suction cup adheres closely to the substrate due to the combined effects of negative pressure and water-mediated sealing. During preloading, free water within the hydrogel is driven into the contact interface, filling microscopic interfacial gaps, reducing trapped air, enhancing negative pressure, and improving sealing^[31]. Upon cooling, the interfacial water gradually freezes to form ice crystals within the microscopic gaps of the adhesion interface, resulting in tight mechanical interlocking. Concurrently, the free and bound water inside the hydrogel progressively crystallizes into ice, compressing and immobilizing the polymer network, thereby transitioning the hydrogel from a soft state to a stiffened state. The synergistic effects of ice-crystal-induced mechanical interlocking, negative-pressure suction, and freezing-induced phase transition collectively contribute to ultra-strong adhesion to the contacted object.

Figure 1. Design and adhesion mechanism of the ice-activated hydrogel suction cups. (A) Schematic illustration of tongue–ice adhesion; (B) Mechanistic schematic of the time-dependent evolution of adhesion at the tongue–ice interface; (C) Hydrogel suction cups fabricated via vat photopolymerization 3D printing; (D) Schematic illustration of ice-activated hydrogel suction cup devices; (E) Illustrations showing the adhesion mechanism of the ice-activated hydrogel suction cups. UV: Ultraviolet.

Mechanical properties and structural evolution of supramolecular hydrogels from ambient to low temperatures

As shown in Figure 2A, DMSO was introduced to disrupt hydrogen bonding, thereby reducing heterogeneity during gelation. The photocured gels were subsequently immersed in DI water to reconstruct the multiple hydrogen-bonding interactions disrupted by the DMSO/H₂O mixed solvent. As a result, poly(N-acryloylsemicarbazide-co-acrylamide) hydrogels acquire excellent mechanical properties through the formation of a dense, physically crosslinked network during solvent exchange from DMSO to water^[45,46]. In addition, partial hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors on the polymer chains undergo mild local microphase separation due to their hydrophobicity in water, which further contributes to the mechanical reinforcement of the equilibrated hydrogels. As shown in Figure 2B-D, the supramolecular hydrogel exhibits excellent soft mechanical properties at room temperature (25 °C), characterized by a tensile strength of 3.13 ± 0.09 MPa, a strain at break of 569.10% ± 5.94%, a Young’s modulus of 0.52 ± 0.02 MPa, and a toughness of 9.39 ± 0.31 MJ·m^-3. Upon cooling, a marked change in the mechanical properties was observed, as shown in Figure 2E and F. The compressive strength increased from 1.44 ± 0.14 to 6.78 ± 1.26 MPa, and the compressive modulus sharply rose from 0.37 ± 0.04 to 5.54 ± 0.27 MPa. This change is attributed to the transformation of the water into ice, causing the hydrogel to transition from a soft state to a stiffened state. This behavior was further confirmed by rheological measurements, as shown in Figure 2G, Supplementary Figures 4 and 5. As the temperature decreases from 25 to -10 °C, the storage modulus (G′) and loss modulus (G′′) initially remain stable but increase sharply around the crystallization point at -7 °C. Simultaneously, the viscosity of the hydrogel increased from 10,000 Pa·s to approximately 25,000 Pa·s. In summary, as the temperature decreases, the bound and free water within the hydrogel gradually transforms into hard ice crystals and grows, leading to the hydrogel’s transition from a soft state to a stiffened state. Furthermore, the growth of ice crystals compresses the internal network, refining the hydrogel structure and allowing the glassy hydrogel to retain a certain level of toughness. We have systematically evaluated the mechanical stability of the hydrogel under repeated freezing-melting conditions. Specifically, we added cyclic compression tests and further investigated the effects of the number of freeze–thaw cycles, freezing duration, and freezing temperature on the mechanical properties of the hydrogel. As shown in Supplementary Figure 6, the hydrogel retained robust mechanical performance during 100 consecutive compression cycles at -25 °C, demonstrating good mechanical durability in the frozen state. Moreover, during repeated freezing–melting treatment, the compressive response of the hydrogel remained nearly unchanged over 10 cycles, as shown in Figure 2H and Supplementary Figure 7A. The compressive strength and modulus exhibited only a slight increase, indicating that repeated phase transitions did not induce noticeable mechanical deterioration, irreversible deformation, or structural damage. As shown in Figure 2I and Supplementary Figure 7B, we further examined the influence of freezing duration and freezing temperature on the hydrogel mechanics. Both the compressive strength and compressive modulus increased rapidly with prolonged freezing time, which can be attributed to the progressive formation of the ice-crystal-reinforced network within the hydrogel matrix. Similarly, lowering the freezing temperature resulted in pronounced increases in both compressive strength and modulus. because a greater fraction of water crystallized and generated a more developed frozen network in Figure 2J and Supplementary Figure 7C. These results are consistent with the proposed ice-reinforcement mechanism and further support the mechanical robustness of the hydrogel under low-temperature operating conditions.

Figure 2. Mechanical properties and structural evolution of supramolecular hydrogels from ambient to low temperatures. (A) Schematic diagram of hydrogen bond reconstruction in hydrogels; (B) Representative tensile stress-strain curves; (C) Young’s modulus and toughness, as well as (D) breaking elongation and tensile strength of hydrogels at 25 °C; (E) Compression stress–strain curves of the hydrogel measured at 25 and -20 °C; (F) Compressive modulus and compressive strength of hydrogels at 25 and -20 °C; (G) Storage modulus G′, loss modulus G′′, and viscosity of the hydrogels from 25 to -10 °C; (H) Compressive loading–unloading curves of the hydrogel during repeated freeze–thaw cycles; (I) Compressive loading–unloading curves of the hydrogel at -20 °C after different freezing times; (J) Compressive loading–unloading curves of the hydrogel at different temperatures. Error bars represent ± SD (n = 3). SD: Standard deviation.

Unprecedented adhesion of ice-activated hydrogel suction cups

As shown in Figure 3A, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based suction cups adhere to substrates primarily through negative-pressure suction, but their limited conformability prevents them from fully filling microscopic surface gaps, resulting in relatively weak adhesion. Upon rapid cooling, the modulus of PDMS increases sharply as it transitions into a stiffened state. This stiffening induces rapid shrinkage of the suction cup surface and interfacial detachment from the substrate, leading to a significant decrease in adhesion strength. In contrast, water-rich soft hydrogel suction cups demonstrate excellent adhesion at room temperature due to water-mediated sealing and liquid-bridge forces. In contrast, hydrogel suction cups exhibit fundamentally different behavior. The presence of water allows effective filling of interfacial gaps, and upon cooling, ice crystals grow within these gaps to form strong mechanical interlocking. Meanwhile, the hydrogel undergoes a transition from a soft state to a stiffened state, further enhancing adhesion strength [Figure 3B]. As shown in Figure 3C and Supplementary Figure 8A, the PDMS suction cup exhibits an adhesion strength of 17.52 kPa at 25 °C, which decreases drastically to nearly negligible levels at -20 °C. In contrast, the hydrogel suction cup shows a dramatic increase in adhesion strength upon cooling, reaching 1,719.67 kPa at -20 °C, representing more than a 50-fold enhancement compared with its performance at 25 °C. Compared with the non-suction hydrogel control, the suction-cavity structure increased the adhesion strength from approximately 420 to 520 kPa after 3 min of freezing [Supplementary Figure 8B]. This enhancement arises not only from negative-pressure suction but also from its ability to stabilize conformal contact and retain interfacial water, thereby promoting ice-mediated mechanical interlocking. Notably, the ice-activated hydrogel suction cup achieves adhesion strengths exceeding 400 kPa within 1 min of cooling at -20 °C, and reaches a stable maximum value after 10 min [Figure 3D]. Futhermore, a electrothermal dry adhesive exhibited an adhesion strength of approximately 1,053 kPa at -90 °C, whereas our hydrogel suction cup achieved approximately 1,700 kPa under the tested conditions [Supplementary Figure 8C]. In parallel, the compressive modulus and strength increased with longer freezing times and lower temperatures, confirming the formation of an ice-reinforced network that improves load-bearing capacity and detachment resistance [Supplementary Figure 8D and E]. As shown in Supplementary Figure 9, the hydrogel suction cup exhibited good conformability and reliable adhesion on these non-ideal surfaces. Furthermore, these hydrogel suction cups exhibit robust adhesion across a variety of substrates, including silicone wafers, glass, S304 stainless steel, and PPX [Figure 3E]. Interfaces containing cracks or pores are typically challenging for conventional suction cups, as negative pressure cannot be effectively established. The ice-activated hydrogel suction cups can stably adhere to such complex surfaces owing to their distinct adhesion mechanism. As shown in Figure 3F and G, when contacting substrates with crack arrays of 0.5 mm width, the soft hydrogel deforms into the cracks, while expelled free water remains confined within the interfacial region. Upon freezing, the resulting ice crystals anchor the hydrogel firmly to the cracked substrate. Strong adhesion (> 500 kPa) is maintained across substrates with different crack sizes. Similarly, as shown in Figure 3H and I, the hydrogel suction cups retain excellent adhesion performance (> 300 kPa) on porous substrates with arrays of 1 and 2 mm diameters, demonstrating their capability for robust adhesion on structurally complex surfaces.

Figure 3. Adhesion performance of ice-activated hydrogel suction cups. (A) Schematic diagram of PDMS suction cup contact process; (B) Schematic illustration of the evolution of interfacial contact in a hydrogel suction cup under freezing conditions; (C) Relative adhesion enhancement of the hydrogel suction cup and PDMS under low-temperature conditions. The annotations (~55 and ~0) indicate the approximately 55-fold increase in adhesion strength of the hydrogel suction cup after ice activation and the nearly negligible adhesion strength of PDMS at low temperature, respectively; (D) Adhesion of hydrogel suction cups at -20 °C after different freezing times; (E) Adhesion of hydrogel suction cups on different substrates; (F) Schematic illustration of ice-activated hydrogel suction cup contact on a cracked surface; (G) Adhesion of ice-activated hydrogel suction cup contact on surfaces with different crack sizes; (H) Schematic illustration of ice-activated hydrogel suction cup contact on a hole surface; (I) Adhesion of ice-activated hydrogel suction cup contact on surfaces with different hole sizes. Error bars represent ± SD (n = 3). PDMS: Polydimethylsiloxane; SD: standard deviation; PPX: parylene.

To provide more direct evidence for ice-crystal-induced mechanical interlocking, optical and fluorescence-microscopy characterizations were performed together with schematic analysis and Supplementary Video recording. As shown in Figure 4A, sequential optical images reveal that ice rapidly propagates upward from the cooling platform into the hydrogel suction cup, leading to rapid freezing of the contact interface. As shown in Figure 4B, we customized the cryogenic adhesion testing platform to facilitate observation of the suction cup’s adhesion process. To visualize interfacial water transport and subsequent ice formation, the hydrogel suction cup was stained with Rhodamine B and observed in situ using a custom-built fluorescence microscope. Transparent acrylic substrates containing gaps of different dimensions were used as model structured surfaces [Figure 4C]. Under preload, the suction cup formed conformal contact with the substrate, while water released from the hydrogel was driven into and filled the interfacial gaps. Residual Rhodamine B fluorescence observed within these gaps after detachment confirmed that interfacial water had penetrated the surface features during contact. More importantly, Figure 4D shown the schematic illustration of ice-crystal growth and evolution in the hydrogel suction cup. As shown in Figure 4E and Supplementary Video show the growth and propagation of ice crystals within the confined interfacial gaps during cooling. Freezing of the trapped water generates physical anchoring sites and mechanical interlocks between the hydrogel suction cup and the substrate, providing an additional adhesion contribution beyond suction-induced negative pressure. Top-view photographs and cross-sectional fluorescence images obtained after detachment further reveal residual fluorescent traces within the gaps [Figure 4F and G], corroborating the infiltration and subsequent freezing of interfacial water. Together, these observations provide direct visual evidence for the proposed ice-activated mechanical interlocking mechanism. To determine whether repeated freezing and thawing compromise the structural integrity and mechanical reliability of the hydrogel, we performed repeated freeze–thaw adhesion cycles and examined the hydrogel suction cup before and after cyclic operation using optical microscopy. As shown in Supplementary Figure 10, the hydrogel suction cup maintained stable adhesion performance during 10 consecutive freezing–adhesion–detachment–thawing cycles, without significant degradation in adhesion strength. Moreover, the optical microscopy images obtained before and after cyclic testing revealed no obvious cracks, surface damage, fragmentation, or permanent structural deformation [Figure 4H]. These results indicate that repeated freezing and thawing do not cause appreciable structural deterioration or increase the susceptibility of the hydrogel suction cup to mechanical failure within the investigated cycle range.

Figure 4. Evolution of the ice-activated hydrogel adhesion process. (A) Time-lapse images of freezing propagation into the hydrogel suction cup; (B) Schematic illustration of the ice-activated suction-cup adhesion testing platform; (C) Photographs showing the adhesion and peeling processes of the hydrogel suction cup; (D) Schematic illustration of ice-crystal growth and evolution in the hydrogel suction cup; (E) Photographs showing ice-crystal growth and evolution in the hydrogel suction cup; (F) Photographs of the interfacial traces after detachment; (G) Fluorescence microscopy images showing residual fluorescent traces within the interfacial grooves after detachment; (H) Photographs and fluorescence microscopy images of the hydrogel suction cup after 10 freeze–thaw adhesion cycles.

To further demonstrate the performance of ice-activated hydrogel suction cups, we fabricated individual hydrogel suction cups with different sizes via vat photopolymerization 3D printing [Figure 5A]. As shown in Figure 5B, individual ice-activated hydrogel suction cups of different sizes all exhibited excellent adhesion performance. Among them, the suction cup with an apparent contact diameters of 7.5 mm showed the highest adhesion strength of 1,719.67 kPa. This can be attributed to the stress-concentrated region at the rim of the hydrogel suction cup during contact, which promotes the formation of an annular sealing zone^[31]. Such a sealing zone enhances adhesion at room temperature and facilitates ice-crystal growth during freezing, thereby further improving adhesion under low-temperature conditions. As shown in Figure 5C, the adhesion strength increased with freezing time and reached a maximum after approximately 10 min. To further demonstrate the versatility of this ice-activated adhesion strategy, suction cup arrays with different apparent contact areas were fabricated in Figure 5D-F. These arrays also exhibited excellent adhesion strength, which increased progressively with freezing time in Figure 5E and F. Therefore, combined with vat photopolymerization 3D printing, this strategy enables the fabrication of ice-activated hydrogel suction cups with various sizes and architectures, all showing strong adhesion performance. We further fabricated bioinspired tree-frog and bush cricket pad structures using vat photopolymerization 3D printing, as shown in Figure 5G. At 25 °C, both structures exhibited negligible adhesion because the printed microfeatures were too large to generate effective capillary and van der Waals interactions. In contrast, as shown in Figure 5H and I, their adhesion increased markedly after ice activation, demonstrating that interfacial freezing and ice-crystal-mediated mechanical interlocking can reinforce hydrogel adhesive structures even when conventional microscale contact forces are insufficient.

Figure 5. Adhesion performance of ice-activated hydrogel suction cups and arrays with different structures. (A) Photos of a single hydrogel suction cup with different apparent contact diameters; (B) Adhesion of a single hydrogel suction cup with different apparent contact diameters; (C) Adhesion of a single hydrogel suction cup at different freezing times; (D) Photos of hydrogel suction cup arrays with different apparent contact areas; (E) Adhesion of hydrogel suction cup arrays with different apparent contact areas; (F) Adhesion of hydrogel suction cup arrays at different freezing times; (G) Schematic illustration of the bush cricket pads and the tree frog pads; (H) Adhesion of hydrogel bush cricket pads at 25 and -20 °C; (I) Adhesion of hydrogel tree frog pads at 25 and -20 °C. Error bars represent ± SD (n = 3). The elements in (A and D) were photographed by the authors. SD: Standard deviation.

Applications of ice-activated hydrogel suction cups

Based on the outstanding adhesion performance and underlying mechanisms, we explored the practical applications of the ice-activated hydrogel suction cups. As shown in Figure 6A, the single ice-activated hydrogel suction cup can easily lift objects with different materials, weights, and shapes in air. In addition, a size-programmable array of suction cups was fabricated based on the advantages of 3D printing technology in Figure 6B. Hydrogel suction cup arrays can adaptively adhere to a variety of challenging surfaces, readily lifting heavy objects with cracked or porous surfaces, which is difficult to achieve with conventional suction cups. Leveraging this excellent manipulation capability, the hydrogel suction cup arrays were integrated with thermally conductive copper tube molds, polyimide film heaters, and semiconductor cooling platforms to construct an adhesion device. As shown in Figure 6C, the device can control adhesion and detachment through heating and cooling. This device could also readily manipulate frozen fish and meat in Figure 6D. These results demonstrate that the hydrogel suction cup-based adhesion system can grasp a broad range of objects, including those with planar and non-planar geometries, as well as rigid and frozen goods. This proof-of-concept demonstration highlights the potential of ice-activated hydrogel adhesion devices for diverse object-transport tasks, including cold-chain food handling, robotic pick-and-place operations, and automated logistics.

Figure 6. Conceptual application demonstration of the ice-activated hydrogel suction cups for gripping and manipulation. (A) The ice-activated hydrogel suction cup lifting various objects; (B) The ice-activated hydrogel suction cup arrays lifting various objects with crack and hole substates; (C) Demonstration of the adhesion devices with ice-activated hydrogel suction cups; (D) Conceptual application demonstration of the ice-activated hydrogel suction cups for biological materials manipulation. The fish and meat samples shown in the figures were commercially purchased from a local market and were used only as non-living food samples for adhesion demonstrations. No live animals or animal experiments were involved. The elements in Figure 6 were photographed by the authors.